Air traffic essay Essay Example for Free

Air traffic essay EssayToday many another(prenominal) another(prenominal) people state that the government activity have to lighten blood line traffic by introducing new charges, because publiciseports generate a lot of ruffle and damage environment. The reason is huge demand for cheap flights, so there are too many people to use airline services. In my opinion, this idea is completely wrong, because of several reasons.To begin with, if there be less people, who can afford themselves to travel by air, then they will choose cars and other cast anchor transport, what will cause a lot more pollution and traffic jams on the roads. Just canvas 100 people on one plane and 100 people on 100 cars. It goes without face that second option is much more damaging for environment.Moreover, such soluton will cause dramatical fall in business activity, because people will not be able to control production performance, visit heavy meetings and so on. Some people will say that these are just minor set-backs, but in fact, we will face the catalyst of new world economic recession.Finally, I see reducing air traffic as a slow-down of progress. If airlines and airports have less financial resources then they will not be able to maintain their development teams. As a result, world will be one-step advertise from cr tucker outing new ways of air travel. Following topics logic, we should start living in lairs and ware with the stick.In conclusion I want to say that services that enjoys great demand are intrinsic for people and they became natural part of societys infrastructure. Today many people state that the government have to lighten air traffic by introducing new charges, because airports generate a lot of flutter and damage environment. The reason is huge demand for cheap flights, so there are too many people to use airline services. In my opinion, this idea is completely wrong, because of several reasons.To begin with, if there be less people, who can afford themselves to travel by air, then they will choose cars and other reason transport, what will cause a lot more pollution and traffic jams on the roads. Just equivalence 100 people on one plane and 100 people on 100 cars. It goes without face that second option is much more damaging for environment.Moreover, such soluton will cause dramatical fall in business activity, because people will not be able to control production performance, visit meaning(a) meetings and so on. Some people will say that these are just minor set-backs, but in fact, we will face the catalyst of new world economic recession.Finally, I see reducing air traffic as a slow-down of progress. If airlines and airports have less financial resources then they will not be able to maintain their development teams. As a result, world will be one-step progress from creating new ways of air travel. Following topics logic, we should start living in lairs and eat with the stick.In conclusion I want to say that services t hat enjoys great demand are subjective for people and they became natural part of societys infrastructure.