Child Obesity in Canada: Strategies for Intervention

claw Obesity in Canada Strategies for InterventionChild Obesity in Canada adjacent Action Needed for a Better FutureExecutive epitomeObesity is a condition that there is excessive body copious which leads to increased morbidity and mortality. Obesity puts children at signifi backt risks for non but wellness problems such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and roll in the haycers, but also flesh and societal issues such as stigma, discrimi republic, social exclusion and decreased donnish capital punishment.Obesity in Canada has become a direct public health concern. The prevalence of childishness fleshiness has increased five-fold from 1981. Currently, there be nigh 600,000 obese groom- of age(p) children countrywide. Obesity represents the nation approximately $1.27 to $11.08 billion per twelvemonth just in health care.Obesity is preventable. Promotion of healthful feeding and rest little lifestyle is considered the most effective measure targeting childho od toilsome and fleshiness. at that place are efforts to tackle this problem from federal, provincial and territorial reserve governments, community, and school boards. However, they are not enough to end the obesity epidemic. There is unagitated no nation everyy standardized school livelihood constitution, resulting in antithetical interpretation and writ of execution of school nutrition policies for our children across the country. The federal, provincial and territorial governments could work together to fix this. In addition, the federal government has attempt to tackle childhood obesity by the Child Fitness value Credit (CFTC) schedule since 2006. However, the CFTC does not prove to be effective and achieving its objectives. There is also a need to review and revise this initiative accordingly. shoal-based handling is proved to be effective in modifying dietary habit and promoting active lifestyle. Reduction of expectant and obesity among students has been obser ved in the APPLE schoolhouse schedule in Alberta. The potential obesity associated cost savings for our nation would be up to 330 million per course if this model was scaled up countrywide.Problem DefinitionObesity is a condition involving an excessive get along of body enlarge. Obesity is norm entirelyy determined by a unprejudiced index of weight-for-height called body-mass-index (BMI). In adults (20 long time and older), a BMI of larger than 25 and 30 is considered grave and obesity respectively 1, 2. For child and teen (2 to less than 20 socio-economic classs), the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends a BMI-for-age percentile scale, in which BMI-for-age from 85% to 95% tile and 95% tile and higher is considered overweight and obesity respectively 3. Although the causes of overweight and obesity are complex, the fundamental rationality is the imbalance between energy consumed and expended. This is normally caused by increased brainch ild of energy-excessive foods and sedentary lifestyle.Obesity is the most commonly seen disorder in children in authentic world. puerility obesity puts children at significant risks of many health problems. This can include chronic and fatal disease like type-2 diabetes, confused types of cancer and cardiovascular disease 4-6. Obesity also places children at a higher risk of stigma, discrimination, social exclusion and decreased academic performance in school 7. However, scientists suggest that the greatest health problems will be seen as the present generation of overweight and obese children becomes the next generation of adults 8, probably with more social and checkup problems and a shorter lifespan than their parents.Childhood obesity in Canada is on the rise and has become a leading public health concern. Currently, more than a quarter of Canadian children and youthfulness are overweight or obese. Obesity and its resulting health effects are extremely expensive. Obesity is theoretically responsible for 9% of deaths among adults aged 20-64 years 9. The cost of obesity in health care ranges from $1.27 to $11.08 billion per year 10.The objectives of this insurance brief are toPromote awareness of childhood obesity problem in Canada and urge for immediate policy actions from federal, provincial and territorial governments, and school boardsMake recommendations on interpolational policy actions to tackle obesity problem. all peer-reviewed publications, health professional agencies (CDC, WHO) materials and government reports are used to offer express and supportive argumentation.Review of EvidenceCanada, like many other developed nations, is facing an emerging epidemic of overweight and obesity. Scientific present indicates hammy increases in both overweight and obesity over the last decades, particularly among children. Prevalence of childhood overweight has tripled since 1981 while that of obesity has increased five-fold during the said(prenominal) period 11, 12. Presently, there are approximately 7 million obese adults and 600.000 obese school-aged children in Canada 12. If current trends continue, 55% of Canadians will be both overweight or obese by 2020 13 and up to 70% of adults aged 40 years will be either overweight or obese by 2040 14.Childhood obesity is driven by a number of factors, including personal, interpersonal factors, organizations, community and a broader social environment 15. It is a complex and multifaceted web of reasons. Thus, a multidimensional and coordinated lift is needed to tackle this health problem. Among many possible interventions, promotion of hefty eating and active lifestyle is considered the most effective measure targeting childhood excessive body weight 16.Junk food and sugar-added beverage provide excessive calorie intake while they lack nutritional value. However, this kind of food is still available in school vending machines or cafeterias in a number of provinces. Further, there is no standard policy on school nutrition, e sparely those related to vending machine foods, across provinces and territories of Canada. While New Brunswick and Ontario see mandatory regulations to ensure that only tidy foods are available at school environment, some others also have but do not cover all levels of education or have weak nutrition standards, which allow sale of high fat and high salt foods 17. Apparently, the differences in school nutrition policies bring on mismatched schooling environment for our children across Canada.It seems agreeable that any obesity legal community program should include some form of corporal action at law protagonism and education 18. The Canadian Paediatrics Society recommends a fit alive for children and youth, in which children and adolescents are recommended to increase the time that they spend on corporal activities and sports by at least 30 min/day, with at least 10 min involving vigorous activities 19. In addition, promoting ph ysical education in school has proved to be effective and is required in a number of places. Arkansas State in the United States mandates that every student in kindergarten through grade nine receive no less than one hour of physical education instruction per week for every student who is physically fit and able to participate 20. For a upper limit effectiveness, physical activities should be promoted at both community and school levels to create a continuum of active living from home to school and vice versa for our children. executable Ways to Address the ProblemOverweight and obesity are preventable 2. Even though there are many policy options, this news report opts to highlight three possible solutions for federal, provincial and territorial policymakers, as good as school boards to win the fight against childhood overweight and obesity. victimisation of a national school nutrition policyEven though education and health rest with provincial and territorial responsibility, a po licy from Health Canada can help shape common standards of school nutrition nationally. Such a policy can ensure that our children have get at to heathy and nutritious foods while they are in school in all provinces, and hence provides better encourageion to our children in fighting against overweight and obesity. This can include, for example, nationally nutrition standards for foods provided in cafeterias, vending machines, and at school special events. This national policy should be mandatory and implemented at all levels of education. Provincial and territorial governments could issue additional school food-related policies to further protect their population. However, the national policy requirements should be adhered and kept as minimum standards. School boards and provincial, territorial health authorities will be responsible for implementation and monitoring of these policies.Revision of Child Fitness Tax Credit programSince 2006, the federal government has actively attemp ted to tackle childhood obesity by introducing Child Fitness Tax Credit (CFTC), in which parents can claim up to $500 to alleviate participation costs when they account children into eligible physical exertion programs 21. However, research has shown that this program does not make full its objectives. CFTC appears to provide little to no benefit to those who cannot afford physical activity program cost and carry that burden until the end of the tax year 22 and those who have no taxable income. Therefore, the CFTC has little impact on physical activities of children in low income families, who most need it. As overweight Canadians in low income households are 40% more likely to be obese than those in high income category 14, the CFTC has failed its childhood obesity taproom. Thus, there is a need to review and revise this initiative, so every Canadian boor has an equal and better chance of participating in physical activity programs.Implementation of school-based intervention p rogramSchool is an ideal place for childhood overweight and obesity prevention intervention as children spend a large proportion of their time at school. There is strong evidence supporting school-based intervention. A review of 16 school-based childhood obesity prevention programs in Chile, Belgium, United Kingdom and the United States shows that a positive permute of dietary habits is highly achievable 18. Specifically, the Alberta Project Promoting Active Living and vigorous Eating (APPLE) School program has proved that an intervention on strong nutrition and active lifestyle in schools has resulted in reduced overweight and obesity in students. Currently, there are 40 APPLE schools in Alberta. If this school model was to be scaled up nationally, the potential cost savings for Canada would be $150 to $330 million per year 23.RecommendationSchool-based program is effective in preventing childhood obesity and thus reducing comorbidity and health spending in the long run. This ap proach has an advantage of reaching close to all children in the community. In addition to health benefits, it may repair student academic performance and provide additional social benefits. Further, it establishes healthy behaviors at early stage of life that can lead to life-long healthy habits 16.Given the complex nature of determinants of childhood overweight and obesity, school-based prevention intervention should be guided by behavioral theoretical frameworks. It is also worth(predicate) to note that involvement of school food program and parent function is the key to success. It has been shown that parent involvement is an important component of school-based intervention 18.It would not be realistic to expect immediate results. Notable reduction in childhood overweight and obesity can only be seen in years with intensive and diversified interventions 18. However, if no action is taken now, our childrens lives are at risk of being deteriorated by social and medical complic ations of excess body weight in the years to come.