The Dialectical Model in Comparative Perspective Essays -- Science Phi

Mankind has not always isolated itself from nature. For the majority of his history, firearm recognized a assume for a dependent and intimate relationship with nature. Nature was his provider and caretaker, a benevolent nurturer intending no harm, a work now known as organic. As the human mind began to increasingly fashion matter to stand for its purpose, however, technological innovation began to supplant nature as mans perceived source of sustenance. Thus technology began its ongoing ascent, becoming a means to subdue a primitive nature and raise man above his lowly origins. In short, a new hierarchical form of nature coalesced. Nevertheless, this relatively new paradigm could not entirely unsettle its predecessor, which evolved into an impotent longing embodied in the pastoral mildew. Human beings tickle in their desires for these dominant models of nature, each possessing appeal within appropriate contexts. This primal struggle suggests their inadequacy as singularly acc urate depictions of nature, and a tercet model must replace these outdated modes of thinking. The dominant models serve as guides to this third model a few modifications of their flaws actu anyy help exploit its foundation. This model is known as the dialectical model, and consists of a unity of all opposites and entities. While every model of nature seeks to engender a appropriate appreciation of nature, many are inconsistent on this point this watching explains why they must generally suppress all others. The dialectical model attempts to remove such a need by discarding the notion of an self-sufficient human existence. By analyzing these models through history and contemporary examples, the dialectical model emerges as a resolution of many inconsistencies in previous mo... ...ted. An integrated, certified existence within an undivided nature provides the entire basis cardinal needs to evaluate human activities. Proper examination of the whole is innate(p) of proper placeme nt of the self.Works CitedRedclift, Michael, and Graham Woodgate, ed. Sociology and the Environment. Social Theory and the globose Environment. London Routledge, 1995.Ross, Carolyn, ed. Writing Nature. New York St. Martins Press, 1995.Emerson, Ralph Waldo. Nature. Ross 421-423.Oates, Joyce Carol. Against Nature. Ross 458-463.Handouts Bibliographical Information unavailableMartin, Emily. Body Narratives, Body Boundaries.Merchant, Carolyn. Nature as Female.Nash, Roderick. Wilderness and the American Mind.RepresentationsMaxim. Feb. 2001.16 Feb. 2001 16 Feb. 2001 http//www.particleadventure.org/frameless/chart.html