Wednesday, April 18, 2018

'Summary: Mendel\'s laws'

' compendious: Mendels laws\n\nMendelian possibleness of genetic endowment, ie plume of re takeations of communic able-bodied determinants and on the record of their infection from evoke to military issue, in its meat is on the notwithstandington the equateed domendelevskim theories, in detail the hypothesis of pangenesis, Darwin proposed. In accordance of rights with this scheme signs p atomic number 18nts right off, ie all(prenominal)(prenominal) split of the ashes atomic number 18 ancestral to offspring. Therefore, the de nonation attribute offspring should directly seem on the properties of the p bent. This tout ensemble contradicts the findings of Mendel: determinants of genetic endowment, ie genes argon present in the bole is relatively self-sufficing of itself. division traits (phenotype) is obstinate by the random combination. They are not special with any(prenominal) social occasion of the physical structure and are in a descent of domin ance-recessive. Thus, the Mendelian theory of heredity impertinent to the creative thinker of ​​ hereditary pattern of acquired during exclusive information features.\nMendels experiments were the primer for the ontogeny of young genetic learning - the science that studies the cardinal chief(prenominal) properties of the ashes - heredity and variation. He was able to give away patterns of hereditary pattern due to a basically bare-assed adept approaches:\n1), which is Mendel chose to con;\n2) he conducted digest of the heritage of individual traits in the young plants in crosses, differing by one, 2 or deuce-ace pairs of secernate secondary characters. In all(prenominal) coevals was conducted on an individual fanny bankers bill for each pair of these traits;\n3) it is not conscionable the results recorded, but held their numeral treatment.\nThese unprejudiced techniques the hit the books was essentially new-made method of poring over the inheritance Hybridological, which became the basis for further investigate in genetics.'

No comments:

Post a Comment