'Deontological Moral Theory Immanuel Kant Essay\r'

'Deontological virtuous guess is defined as the virtuously so far up thing to do is to do some(prenominal) is your art. A scenario in which this theory could be used is the following: a last friend of yours dies. He has set past $10 one million million million to buy the farm to his pet sports team, the New York Yankees. You promised him that you would give the money to the team be safari that was your friend’s last wish. Generous, further as you argon walking to Yankee Stadium to give the money to George Steinbrenner (the owner) you expose a sign that hypothesises, â€Å"World food for thought Program: lead $10 million to keep on numerous villages in Africa”.\r\nYou value about giving the money to the organic law because that would be the utilitarian thing to do, to help out as many concourse as you peradventure could, but is that the correct thing to do when you promised you friend that you would give the money to the Yankees? You think to yourse lf, the Yankees don’t need the money, they be already a great baseball team curb plenty of money from their owner. This money could save countless people from starvation. But you are obligated to give the money to the Yankees because that was your duty.\r\n peerless of the best and well know philosopher’s of the Enlightenment is Immanuel Kant. Kant’s view on ethics was: it’s absolute, the duties or imperatives are non hypothetical, but categorical (Pojman and Vaughn, 239). This pith that our moral duties need to be do on reasoning, non feelings. Humans go past victim to incorporating their Sikkema 1 feelings into ethical, moral duties sooner often, Kant’s theory displaces this and informs us that our duties need to be executed in a reasoned manner instead. Kant be The\r\n full Will as well as the lead proposal of marriages of morality. These reinforce his theory of categoric Imperative. This theory, later described, reinforces that moral duties be reasoned and separated from feelings. The life-threatening Will composed by Kant says that, â€Å"Nothing can possibly be conceived in the world, or even out of it, which can be called good, without qualification, still a Good Will (Pojman and Vaughn 240). Good Will is known as the tho thing that is good without any exceptions or rejections.\r\nThis government agency that all other things that whitethorn be good aren’t because they carry other f playors to be considered good. These other factors cause the good to accommodate tarnished. The first of the three propositions is ‘An bring through must be through from a sense of duty, if it is to tolerate moral worth’ (Pojman and Vaughn, 242). What this proposition mover is, to be morally responsible and worthy of something, the action must be make in a way that the person believes it is their duty. An causa of this is someone who is having thoughts of self-destruction non committing suicide bec ause the reason that this heinous act is â€Å" self-centred”.\r\nThe second proposition is: an action through with(p) form duty derives its moral worth, not form the purpose which is to be win by it, but from the saw (Pojman and Vaughn, 245). What this proposition means is the action itself doesn’t have moral significance but the moral worth is found in the maxim (rule) itself. The third proposition is: duty is the indispensableness of acting from respect for the law (Pojman and Vaughn, 246). What this means is following maxims is needed in Sikkema 2 performing rational duties.\r\nIf these duties are not carried out following the law, they are considered not pure. A scenario representing the third proposition would be not treachery on a midterm. It is your duty as a assimilator to take the midterm and to not cheat. The cheating would be considered not abiding by the maxims enforced by professors. Kant’s theory, monotonic Imperative, states that, â€Å"I am never to act otherwise than to will that my maxim should become universal law (Pojman and Vaughn, 247). Kant goes on to say in the description of Categorical Imperative, â€Å"…\r\nI presently become aware that bit I can will the lie, I can by no means will that lying should be a universal law. What Kant is trying to describe is that with himself lying, he destroys essential maxims. The Good Will as well as the three propositions lend to the effectiveness of Kant’s Categorical Imperative. Kant’s theory emphasizes the fact that good is merely good if the act is consciously done with the outcome of a duty existence done. However, this duty becomes flawed because of feelings being convoluted in the duty instead of the duty being completed because of reasoning. Sikkema 3.\r\n'