Fourth Amendment Exceptions Summary Essay

The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution requires that no inquisition or seizure shall be carried out unless a warrant has been issued. The exceptions atomic number 18 seekes with consent, frisks, plain feel/plain view, incident to arrest, automobile exceptions, egregious quite a little and open fields, abandoned property and public place exceptions (Harr, Hess, 2006, p. 219). Consent to search any property must be make passn by t actual owners or, as set forth in the United States v Matlock (1974) by a person in charge of that property. If, for instance more than than one person owns a property, only one of those individuals must go consent. There are exceptions to that rule as well. Only commonly divided up areas of that property may be searched (Harr,Hess, 2006). Take for instance a family lifetime in an apartment which comprises of a husband, wife and sister to the man. The sister would consume consent for common areas, such as the living room, den, kitche n, and bathroom, to be searched and she cannot give consent to allowing the bedroom of the brother and sister in-law to be searched.The husband, on the other hand, could consent to having the bedroom searched because it is there joint bedroom and is not off-limits to him. Other conditions on the searches incident to arrest exception take on the use of force, the search of other individuals with the arrested individual, searching the vehicle of an arrest person, modernity and inventory searches if a government agent has probable cause to look at the vehicle contains contraband or evidence of a crime without a warrant because in the time it would take to get a warrant, the car, number one wood and contraband or evidence could be long gone (Harr, Hess, 2006. p. 231). The 1981 result of Robbins v. California saw the justifications for searching without a warrant. Those specifications include that the mobility of vehicles produce exigent circumstances.